Skip to content
PYD ENTERPRISES

Compare approaches

Five ways to modernize, compared honestly.

PYD ENTERPRISES extracts specifications. It does not transpile, rehost or write your new system, and several of these approaches pair well with it. Each comparison ends with the cases where the alternative is the better call.

At a glance

What each approach gives you.

Read across a row to see where each approach is strong. PYD ENTERPRISES' own column is deliberately absent: the detail pages put it side by side with each one.

Manual code auditGeneric LLM migrationAutomated transpilersRewrite from scratchLift-and-shift rehosting
Produces a reviewed specificationYes, by handUnverified proseNoFrom interviewsNo
Covers every executable pathSampledContext windowConverted, not explainedNoUnchanged
Changes the codeNoOftenYes, mechanicallyReplaces itMinimally
Typical first resultMonthsMinutesWeeksMonthsMonths
Best atBusiness contextExplaining one programFast platform exitClean designPlatform cost

Where PYD ENTERPRISES sits

Before the decision, not instead of it.

Every approach on this page has to answer the same question at some point: what does the current system actually do? Manual audits answer it slowly and partially. Language models answer it fluently and without proof. Transpilers and rehosting postpone it. Rewrites answer it late, in testing or in production.

PYD ENTERPRISES answers it first, with deterministic parsing and source-linked rules, so the choice between rewrite, transpile, rehost or buy is made with the rule inventory on the table. Many customers combine approaches: they rehost for cost, then extract specifications to re-architect the parts of the estate that change most.

Stop spending six months reading legacy code by hand.

Run PYD ENTERPRISES on 100,000 lines of COBOL or Java in your private VPC and review OpenAPI specs and DMN tables tomorrow.